Peer Review Process

The manuscript submitted is initially subjected to a thorough examination by the editors to ensure that it does not contain any plagiarized content. Furthermore, the degree of similarity is limited to a maximum of 20%. A comprehensive evaluation of the submitted manuscript will be conducted to determine its suitability within the confines of our focus and scope, as well as to identify any major methodological shortcomings.

In order to ensure a rigorous assessment, a minimum of two peer-reviewers will be assigned to review each submitted paper. These reviewers will be kept unaware of the authors' identities, and likewise, the authors will not have knowledge of the reviewers' identities (referred to as the double-blind review method). During the reviewing process, various aspects such as novelty, objectivity, methodology, scientific impact, conclusion, and references will be taken into consideration. Subsequently, the reviewers' comments will be conveyed to the corresponding author, who will then be required to take appropriate actions and provide responses as necessary. The suggested decision will undergo evaluation during an editorial board meeting. Following this, the final decision will be communicated to the corresponding author by the editor.