Cognitive and Neurolinguistic Perspectives on Arabic Sentence Processing in Native and Non-Native Speakers / المنظورات المعرفية والعصبية اللغوية في معالجة الجمل العربية لدى الناطقين بها وغير الناطقين بها

Authors

  • Wilson. F Department of Middle Eastern Studies, University of Texas at Austin, United States
  • Fadilah Zahra School of Literature and Language, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia

Keywords:

Arabic sentence processing, neurolinguistics, cognitive, strategies

Abstract

his study investigates the cognitive and neurolinguistic aspects of Arabic sentence processing among native and non-native speakers. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates behavioral experiments and neuroimaging techniques (EEG and fMRI) to analyze differences in sentence comprehension and processing strategies. The participants included 30 native Arabic speakers (L1) and 30 advanced Arabic learners (L2), ensuring linguistic diversity.The results revealed significant differences in reaction time and accuracy between native and non-native speakers, with L2 learners exhibiting longer processing times and lower comprehension accuracy, particularly in syntactically complex sentences. Neuroimaging data indicated distinct brain activation patterns, with native speakers relying on automatic syntactic processing while non-native speakers showed increased reliance on working memory-related areas. The findings also highlighted cognitive strategies used by non-native speakers to compensate for linguistic challenges, including reliance on lexical cues and contextual inference. These results have important implications for Arabic language instruction, suggesting that curriculum design should incorporate targeted strategies to enhance syntactic parsing efficiency among L2 learners. While the study provides valuable insights, limitations such as sample size and experimental conditions warrant further longitudinal research to track changes in sentence processing over time.

References

Binder, J. R. (2017). Current controversies on Wernicke’s area and its role in language. Brain and Language, 164, 1-9.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.

Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2018). Some notes on the shallow structure hypothesis. Second Language Research, 34(4), 545-572.

Dehaene, S. (2020). How we learn: Why brains learn better than any machine… for now. Penguin Random House.

DeKeyser, R. (2018). Age effects in second language learning: Stepping stones toward better understanding. Language Learning, 68(S1), 101-132.

Ellis, R. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

Fitrianto, I. (2019). ماليزيا بجامعة دار السلام كونتور العام: KUISتنفيذ الدورة المكثفة في اللغة العربية لطلاب الكلية الجامعية الإسلامية العالمية بسلانجور 2018 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Darussalam Gontor).‎

Fitrianto, I. (2024). Critical Reasoning Skills: Designing an Education Curriculum Relevant to Social and Economic Needs. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 245-258.

Fitrianto, I. (2024). Innovation and Technology in Arabic Language Learning in Indonesia: Trends and Implications. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 134-150.

Fitrianto, I. (2024). Strategi Guru Pai Dalam Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Hadis Kelas 8 MTS Ibadurrahman Subaim. IJER: Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 356-363.

Fitrianto, I., & Abdillah, F. M. (2018). MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROGAM PEMANTAPAN BAHASA ARAB DAN SHAHSIAH (KEMBARA) KE 4 MAHASISWA KOLEJ UNIVERSITI ISLAM ANTAR BANGSA SELANGOR (KUIS) TAHUN 2018. University of Darussalam Gontor 15-16 September 2018, 121.

Fitrianto, I., & Hamid, R. (2024). Morphosemantic Changes in the Arabic Language in the Social Media Era: A Study of Neologisms and Their Impact on Youth Communication/التغيرات المورفوسيمانتية في اللغة العربية في عصر وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي: دراسة حول النيو لوغيزم وتأثيرها على تواصل الشباب. IJAS: International Journal of Arabic Studies, 1(1 September), 25-39.

Fitrianto, I., & Saif, A. (2024). The role of virtual reality in enhancing Experiential Learning: a comparative study of traditional and immersive learning environments. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 97-110.

Fitrianto, I., Hamid, R., & Mulalic, A. (2023). The effectiveness of the learning strategy" think, talk, write" and snowball for improving learning achievement in lessons insya'at Islamic Boarding School Arisalah. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 13-22.

Fitrianto, I., Setyawan, C. E., & Saleh, M. (2024). Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Arabic Language Learning Plans. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 30-40.

Friederici, A. D. (2017). Language in our brain: The origins of a uniquely human capacity. MIT Press.

Friederici, A. D. (2017). Language in our brain: The origins of a uniquely human capacity. MIT Press.

Friston, K. (2007). Statistical parametric mapping. Academic Press.

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2017). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.

Gunawan, R., syafii Tampubolon, M., & Fitrianto, I. (2024). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Buku Ajar Al-Arabiyyah Bayna Yadaik di Kelas XG MA ICBB Yogyakarta. IJER: Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 208-215.

Hagoort, P. (2019). The neurobiology of language beyond single-word processing. Science, 366(6461), 55-58.

Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Neural basis of speech perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(5), 393-402

Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Neural basis of speech perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(5), 393-402.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122-149.

Kaan, E. (2019). Predictive sentence processing in second language comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(5), 932-944.

Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621-647.

Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203-205.

Li, P., & Jeong, H. (2021). The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 41, 1-21.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2021). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.

Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457-1506.

Said, A. H., Fitrianto, I., & Jamilah, H. A. (2022). الأفعال المتعدّية بحرف الجرّ في كتاب القراءة الوافية المقرّر للصّفّ السّادس دلالية/Transgressive verbs (Harf Jar) in the sixth-grade reading book (Grammatica/Transgressive verbs (Harf Jar) in the sixth-grade reading book (Grammatical semantic study). Diwan: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Arab, 8(1).

Trofimovich, P., & McDonough, K. (2020). Applying priming methods to L2 research: Insights and challenges. Language Learning, 70(S2), 1-29.

Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1-2), 231-270

Ullman, M. T. (2020). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological framework for language learning, memory, and use. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 72, 1-40.

VanPatten, B. (2021). Why explicit knowledge cannot become implicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(1), 1-25

Downloads

Published

2025-03-27