Adaptive Learning Technologies in Structural Engineering Education: Immediate and Contextual Evaluations
Keywords:
Adaptive learning, Technologies, Structural Engineering Education, Contextual EvaluationsAbstract
Adaptive learning technologies are increasingly transforming structural engineering education by offering personalized learning experiences and real-time feedback. Grounded in Adaptive Learning Theory and Instructional Design Models, these technologies utilize artificial intelligence (AI) and dynamic assessment tools to tailor instructional content to each student's learning profile, thus enhancing engagement and academic achievement. Key components include immediate feedback, personalized learning paths, and the use of AI techniques such as fuzzy extreme learning machines (ELM) for improved predictive accuracy. This study adopts a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test design, supported by perception questionnaires and log data from adaptive learning platforms. Statistical analysis includes t-tests and linear regression to assess learning gains and engagement levels. The hypothesis posits that adaptive learning significantly improves student outcomes compared to traditional instruction. Preliminary findings indicate heightened engagement, improved conceptual understanding, and strong user satisfaction. These outcomes affirm the value of adaptive learning technologies in structural engineering education while emphasizing the need for further refinement in evaluation practices, accessibility, and ethical design.
References
Alhosban, A., Amoush, R., & Al-Ababneh, H. (2024). ALT-D: Enhancing accessibility with an adaptive learning technologies assessment model for students with disabilities. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 30th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT 2024).
Barclay, N., Westine, C. D., Claris, A., & Martin, F. (2020). Use of adaptive learning in an engineering technology course: A case study. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.
Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013006004
Chin, C. S., & Ming, K. W. (2024). Boosting performance with AI-powered adaptive learning. Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference.
Dziuban, C. D., Moskal, P. D., Cassisi, J. E., & Fawcett, A. (2016). Adaptive learning in psychology: Wayfinding in the digital age. Online Learning Journal, 20(3), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i3.976
Fitrianto, I. (2019). ماليزيا بجامعة دار السلام كونتور العام: KUISتنفيذ الدورة المكثفة في اللغة العربية لطلاب الكلية الجامعية الإسلامية العالمية بسلانجور 2018 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Darussalam Gontor).
Fitrianto, I. (2024). Critical Reasoning Skills: Designing an Education Curriculum Relevant to Social and Economic Needs. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 245-258.
Fitrianto, I. (2024). Innovation and Technology in Arabic Language Learning in Indonesia: Trends and Implications. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 134-150.
Fitrianto, I. (2024). Strategi Guru Pai Dalam Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Hadis Kelas 8 MTS Ibadurrahman Subaim. IJER: Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 356-363.
Fitrianto, I., & Abdillah, F. M. (2018). MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROGAM PEMANTAPAN BAHASA ARAB DAN SHAHSIAH (KEMBARA) KE 4 MAHASISWA KOLEJ UNIVERSITI ISLAM ANTAR BANGSA SELANGOR (KUIS) TAHUN 2018. University of Darussalam Gontor 15-16 September 2018, 121.
Fitrianto, I., & Hamid, R. (2024). Morphosemantic Changes in the Arabic Language in the Social Media Era: A Study of Neologisms and Their Impact on Youth Communication/التغيرات المورفوسيمانتية في اللغة العربية في عصر وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي: دراسة حول النيو لوغيزم وتأثيرها على تواصل الشباب. IJAS: International Journal of Arabic Studies, 1(1 September), 25-39.
Fitrianto, I., & Saif, A. (2024). The role of virtual reality in enhancing Experiential Learning: a comparative study of traditional and immersive learning environments. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 97-110.
Fitrianto, I., Hamid, R., & Mulalic, A. (2023). The effectiveness of the learning strategy" think, talk, write" and snowball for improving learning achievement in lessons insya'at Islamic Boarding School Arisalah. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 13-22.
Fitrianto, I., Setyawan, C. E., & Saleh, M. (2024). Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Arabic Language Learning Plans. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 30-40.
Haritos, N. (2019). Hands-on experiential learning of structural mechanics. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, 20(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2018.1512755
Hurlen, E. C. (2020). A multi-year comparison of student performance in an adaptive and inverted classroom versus a traditional learning environment. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.
Lagubeau, G., Tecpan-Flores, S., & Hernández, C. (2020). Active learning reduces academic risk of students with nonformal reasoning skills: Evidence from an introductory physics massive course in a Chilean public university. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010114
Lin, Y., & Wang, S. (2019). The study and application of adaptive learning method based on virtual reality for engineering education. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 11705, pp. 105–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22338-0_10
Liu, C., & Sun, Z. (2025). Empirical study on the efficacy of engineering education via an AI-driven adaptive learning environment for architectural structural analysis. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 25(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.3233/JCM-220205
Liu, M., McKelroy, E., Corliss, S. B., & Carrigan, J. E. (2017). Investigating the effect of an adaptive learning intervention on students’ learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9487-0
Rangel-Ramirez, J. G., Crespo, S. E., Rodriguez-Paz, M. X., & Carrasco, L. H. H. (2024). A continuous evaluation system for a challenge-based structural engineering course. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.
Rincon-Flores, E. G., Castano, L., Guerrero Solis, S. L., & Aldape Valdés, L. P. (2024). Improving the learning-teaching process through adaptive learning strategy. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00246-7
Saul, K., Howard, A. K. T., Webster, Z., & Spencer, D. (2022). An adaptive learning engineering mechanics curricular sequence. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.
Slomp, E. M., Ropelato, D., Bonatti, C., & Da Silva, M. D. (2024). Adaptive learning in engineering courses: How artificial intelligence (AI) can improve academic outcomes. EDUNINE 2024 - 8th IEEE World Engineering Education Conference: Empowering Engineering Education: Breaking Barriers through Research and Innovation, Proceedings.
Tasliarmut, F., Mirboland, M., & Koch, C. (2025). A framework for adaptive learning and teaching in higher education in engineering. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering.
Tuyboyov, O., Turdikulova, B., Davlatova, R., & Norov, S. (2025). The role of AI-driven intelligent tutoring systems in enhancing mechanical engineering education. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2600(1), 020001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0123456
Van Alten, D. C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J. J. H. M., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003
Voutetaki, M. E., & Thomoglou, A. K. (2024). Experiential learning in architectural engineering school through the hands-on workshop: Practically without calculations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2812(1), 050002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0135478.
